Postpartum Depression-New Screening Recommendations and Treatments.

This Insights in the Women's Health series describes perinatal depression (occurring prepregnancy through postpartum periods) and new recommendations and treatment guidelines for this condition.

Guía de práctica clínica para el tamizaje de cáncer de mama / Clinical practice guideline for breast cancer screening

El cáncer de mama es una de los cánceres más diagnosticados y la quinta causa de muerte relacionada a cáncer a nivel mundial. Según la GLOBOCAN, para el 2020 se estimaron 2.3 millones de nuevos casos a nivel mundial (1). Según estimaciones de la Organización Mundial de la Salud, en el 2016 esta enfermedad causó 19,6 millones de años de vida ajustados por discapacidad (AVAD) (2). En el Perú, este tipo de cáncer es la segunda neoplasia más frecuente. En el 2020 el Perú registró un total de 6860 casos nuevos de cáncer de mama, para ambos sexos, lo cual representó el 9.8% del total de canceres diagnosticados ese año (3). En el Seguro Social de Salud (EsSalud), de 2008 a agosto de 2021, se han diagnosticados 59 361 casos nuevos de cáncer de mama. Para el 2019 la mayor incidencia se registró en la población adulta mayor de 70 a 79 años (3). El tamizaje y la detección temprana de cáncer de mama podrían ser medios efectivos para reducir la mortalidad por cáncer de mama (4). Por ello, EsSalud priorizó la realización de la presente guía de práctica clínica (GPC) para establecer lineamientos basados en evidencia para gestionar de la mejor manera los procesos y procedimientos para el tamizaje del cáncer de mama. Esta GPC fue realizada por la Dirección de Guías de Práctica Clínica, Farmacovigilancia y Tecnovigilancia del Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI) de EsSalud.

Screening for Depression and Suicide Risk in Children and Adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Importance: Depression is a leading cause of disability in the US. Children and adolescents with depression typically have functional impairments in their performance at school or work as well as in their interactions with their families and peers. Depression can also negatively affect the developmental trajectories of affected youth. Major depressive disorder (MDD) in children and adolescents is strongly associated with recurrent depression in adulthood; other mental disorders; and increased risk for suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide completion. Suicide is the second-leading cause of death among youth aged 10 to 19 years. Psychiatric disorders and previous suicide attempts increase suicide risk. Objective: To update its 2014 and 2016 recommendations, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the benefits and harms of screening, accuracy of screening, and benefits and harms of treatment of MDD and suicide risk in children and adolescents that would be applicable to primary care settings. Population: Children and adolescents who do not have a diagnosed mental health condition or are not showing recognized signs or symptoms of depression or suicide risk. Evidence Assessment: The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for MDD in adolescents aged 12 to 18 years has a moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient on screening for MDD in children 11 years or younger. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient on the benefit and harms of screening for suicide risk in children and adolescents owing to a lack of evidence. Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends screening for MDD in adolescents aged 12 to 18 years. (B recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for MDD in children 11 years or younger. (I statement) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for suicide risk in children and adolescents. (I statement).

External quality assessment of COVID-19 real time reverse transcription PCR laboratories in India.

Sudden emergence and rapid spread of COVID-19 created an inevitable need for expansion of the COVID-19 laboratory testing network across the world. The strategy to test-track-treat was advocated for quick detection and containment of the disease. Being the second most populous country in the world, India was challenged to make COVID-19 testing available and accessible in all parts of the country. The molecular laboratory testing network was augmented expeditiously, and number of laboratories was increased from one in January 2020 to 2951 till mid-September, 2021. This rapid expansion warranted the need to have inbuilt systems of quality control/ quality assurance. In addition to the ongoing inter-laboratory quality control (ILQC), India implemented an External Quality Assurance Program (EQAP) with assistance from World Health Organization (WHO) and Royal College of Pathologists, Australasia. Out of the 953 open system rRTPCR laboratories in both public and private sector who participated in the first round of EQAP, 891(93.4%) laboratories obtained a passing score of > = 80%. The satisfactory performance of Indian COVID-19 testing laboratories has boosted the confidence of the public and policy makers in the quality of testing. ILQC and EQAP need to continue to ensure adherence of the testing laboratories to the desired quality standards.

Age-specific effectiveness of a tuberculosis screening intervention in children.

OBJECTIVE: To apply a cascade-of-care framework to evaluate the effectiveness-by age of the child-of an intensified tuberculosis patient-finding intervention. DESIGN: From a prospective screening program at four hospitals in Pakistan (2014-2016) we constructed a care cascade comprising six steps: screened, positive screen, evaluated, diagnosed, started treatment, and successful outcome. We evaluated the cascade by each year of age from 0 to 14 and report the age-specific mean proportion and standard deviation. RESULTS: On average across all ages, only 12.5% (standard deviation: 2.0%) of children with a positive screen were not evaluated. Among children who had a complete evaluation, the highest percentages of children diagnosed with tuberculosis were observed in children 0-4 (mean: 31.9%; standard deviation: 4.8%), followed by lower percentages in children 5-9 (mean: 22.4%; standard deviation: 2.2%), and 10-14 (mean: 26.0%; standard deviation:5.4%). Nearly all children diagnosed with tuberculosis initiated treatment, and an average of 93.3% (standard deviation: 3.3%) across all ages had successful treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention was highly effective across ages 0-14 years. Our study illustrates the utility of applying operational analyses of age-stratified cascades to identify age-specific gaps in pediatric tuberculosis care that can guide future, novel interventions to close these gaps.